Core concepts

Keep the proof connected to the decision.

Clarivy hides graph complexity from analysts while preserving enough lineage for another reviewer to reconstruct what happened.

The evidence model

ObjectPlain meaningWhat Clarivy preserves
ClaimA statement that still needs verification.Text, classification, confidence and review state
EvidenceMaterial offered in support of a claim.Source, excerpt or artifact, timestamp, collector and hash
SourceWhere the material came from.URL, connector, provider event or uploaded artifact
Policy gateA requirement the evidence must satisfy.Gate identifier, rule result and policy version
Human reviewA named assessment of the evidence.Actor, outcome, reason and time
Decision lineageThe append-only history connecting actions and outcomes.Sequence, causation and integrity chain

Evidence lineage

The workspace stays case-oriented. Underneath it, Clarivy records relationships such as supported by, derived from, satisfies policy gate and reviewed by.

Lineage is generated from normal case work. Reviewers stay in the case workspace; they do not operate a separate graph tool.

Integrity does not mean truth

A SHA-256 content hash is a digital fingerprint. If the preserved content changes, the hash changes. It helps prove consistency, but it does not prove that a document is authentic or that a claim is true.

What a hash proves

The content verified later is byte-for-byte consistent with the content preserved earlier.

What still needs review

Authenticity, issuer authority, context, expiry, relevance and whether the evidence satisfies policy.

Why policy snapshots matter

Every case binds to an immutable published policy version. If an administrator changes tomorrow’s workflow, yesterday’s case still points to the exact criteria, evidence requirements and review gates that applied when it ran.

QuestionPacket answer
Which rules applied?Published policy name, version and compiled hash
What proof supported the case?Claims, source references, files and content hashes
What was unresolved?Missing evidence, contradictions and exceptions
Who acted?Authenticated actors, roles, actions and timestamps
Why was an exception accepted?Named rationale and maker–checker state
Did the history change?Audit-chain and evidence-graph verification results

Reconstructable decision packet

A reconstructable packet is not just a PDF summary. It is a portable case record that lets a reviewer follow the applicable policy, the exact proof, unresolved issues, human actions and rationale from beginning to end.

Continue reading

Workflow model

See how policy and evidence concepts become a controlled operating process.